Legislature(1997 - 1998)
02/11/1998 02:15 PM Senate JUD
Audio | Topic |
---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE February 11, 1998 2:15 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT Senator Robin Taylor, Chairman Senator Drue Pearce, Vice-Chairman Senator Mike Miller MEMBERS ABSENT Senator Sean Parnell Senator Johnny Ellis COMMITTEE CALENDAR SENATE BILL NO. 218 "An Act relating to the crime of murder and to murder of children." - MOVED CSSB 218(JUD) OUT OF COMMITTEE CONFIRMATION HEARINGS: SELECT COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE ETHICS PREVIOUS SENATE COMMITTEE ACTION SB 218 - See Judiciary minutes dated 2-9-98. WITNESS REGISTER Mr. Dennis Cook 431 Birch Hill Rd Fairbanks, Ak 99712 POSITION STATEMENT: Appointee to Legislative Ethics Board Susie Barnett Legislative Ethics Committee 716 West 4th Avenue Anchorage, Ak 99501 POSITION STATEMENT: Commented on Confirmations ACTION NARRATIVE TAPE 98-7, SIDE A Number 001 CHAIRMAN ROBIN TAYLOR called the Judiciary Committee meeting to order at 2:17 for the purpose of a work session to review appointments to the Select Committee on Legislative Ethics. Present were SENATOR MILLER and CHAIRMAN TAYLOR who indicated they would proceed in this manner until another member arrived and their quorum was satisfied. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR asked MR. COOK for a brief biographical sketch and explanation of why he would like to serve on the board. MR. DENNIS COOK said he was born and raised in Fairbanks, leaving only to attend school and briefly work in Juneau. He has a large family in Fairbanks and strong ties to the Fairbanks community. He reviewed his work experience from odd jobs in high school to current position as partner in a large Fairbanks firm. Additionally, he has served on the Tanana Valley State Fair board for many years, and he also participates in church activities, Rotary, and Boy Scouts. MR. COOK said he got a call saying he had been recommended and he had no reason why he couldn't serve so he said he was willing. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR expressed appreciation for MR. COOK'S willingness to serve. He expressed concern that the Ethics Committee has a tendency to become the committee on morality and he hopes MR. COOK'S background and expertise can keep them on track and out of emotionally charged moral issues. MR. COOK replied that in the practice of law, a person is held to a high moral standard. This standard is set out in the cannon. He said he is familiar with the concept of conflicts of interest and believes he can work within this particular framework. He has received the standards of conduct handbook and has reviewed it. He feels confident that he will be judging people on their actions, not their morals, and that he can be fairly objective. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR asked him to review opinion 98-1. He said when signing on to the litigation regarding subsistence, he assumed he was signing as a legislator, not an individual. He did not think he was benefitting personally from legal services provided. If in fact the opinion is correct, each person would be well advised to remove their individual names and maintain their positions as legislators. MR. COOK said he would review that opinion and CHAIRMAN TAYLOR thanked him for that and said unfortunately some of the cases that will come before him may have a strong political bias in the advocacy of the case itself. He said some complaints may involve stupid or drunken acts but these may not rise to the standard of conflict of interest. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR expressed confidence in MR. COOK as an attorney and man of high standards and again thanked him for his willingness to serve. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR acknowledged the arrival of SENATOR PEARCE and announced they had a quorum to do business. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR mentioned that SENATOR PEARCE was also a member of the ethics committee and SENATOR MILLER and CHAIRMAN TAYLOR both applauded her for her fine work on that committee. He then moved the appointment of MR. COOK and, without objection, it was so ordered. MS. SUSIE BARNETT, staff to the Select Committee on Legislative ethics, announced to the committee that Mr. Granger was traveling out of the country and would not be available to speak today. SENATOR PEARCE stated that Mr. Granger is a reappointment and, in her opinion, has served with distinction. He brings a sage, calm presence and unless the committee has a specific concern, she suggested they forward his name to the full body. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR so moved. MS. BARNETT thanked the committee for considering these appointments, saying otherwise they would have trouble getting a quorum. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR said it was no problem but reminded her they would still have to be voted on in the full Senate. MS. BARNETT understood this and told CHAIRMAN TAYLOR she would forward a copy of opinion 98-1 to MR. COOK. SENATOR PEARCE asked if the board members served until they were officially replaced. SUSIE BARNETT replied that members who are reappointed serve in a quasi-member role; they are not allowed to vote but they may come to meetings. She said they have never had a new appointment under the new structure and currently there is no one to serve in this position. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR suggested the committee might take a look at that problem. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR informed the committee that when they moved out CSSB 218 (JUD) there was a technical glitch with the language suggested by MR. GUANELI, so CHAIRMAN TAYLOR retained the bill. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR did not transfer it on to the clerk and therefore remains in the possession of the Judiciary committee. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR asked SENATOR MILLER to withdraw his motion to adopt the committee substitute in order that they might adopt the corrected version. SENATOR MILLER so moved and, without objection, CSSB 218(JUD) was back before them and SENATOR MILLER moved the committee adopt the K version of the bill. Again hearing no objection, version K was adopted. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR explained the problem was with the phrase "recklessly or" This phrase was deleted per a memo from the bill drafter. SENATOR MILLER moved CSSB 218(JUD) Luckhaupt version K from committee with individual recommendations. Without objection, the bill moved from committee. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR updated the committee on the Alaska Public Safety Information Network (APSIN) inquiry. He said he was informed by the Department of Law that someone in the Department of Public Safety (DPS) called and informed the public safety employees' union of their service of the subpoena on Commissioner Otte. The union is now threatening to bring suit in an attempt to quash the committee's subpoena and MR. GUANELI has drafted an agreement for the committee to sign. The agreement covers confidentiality of documents and would prevent the committee from disclosing any information they obtain. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR said this would necessitate them doing everything behind closed doors and he is not excited about that. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR said they may have to do some things privately but he prefers to do things in public to the greatest extent possible. He said the document drafted by MR. GUANELI was so broad it covered personnel files, documents generated by the DPS audit and even third party documents. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR said all these documents would have to be kept totally confidential and be available only to the committee and their immediate staff who would be subject to criminal sanctions if information was leaked. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR told the committee he had informed MR. NORSWORTHY he was not happy to sign such a document. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR said it is his understanding that the document was drafted by MR. GUANELI so as to make certain the unions did not bring a suit and he was unclear who MR. GUANELI is representing by this action. SENATOR PEARCE asked if the union would go to court to challenge their right to issue a subpoena. She said they clearly have the right to do so, by statute. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR said they claimed the information the committee might receive as a result of the subpoena might be covered by the Public Employees Confidentiality Act. SENATOR PEARCE said confidential information would have to be kept confidential by the committee and CHAIRMAN TAYLOR agreed, saying he had no problem instructing the committee about what is confidential. He repeated that he did not want to sign a 'blanket agreement'. SENATOR PEARCE wondered why MR. GUANELI would care if the committee was sued. She said she would be interested to see the court decision and she could not imagine the court telling them they could not get information. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR agreed with SENATOR PEARCE and told the committee he just wanted to let them know what was happening. With no other business to come before them, CHAIRMAN TAYLOR adjourned the judiciary committee.
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|